<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Biomedicine on Display</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.corporeality.net/museion/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.corporeality.net/museion</link>
	<description>Medical Museion @ University of Copenhagen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:40:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Today is World Philosophy Day: Should we kill healthy people for their organs? by Ally</title>
		<link>http://www.corporeality.net/museion/2008/11/20/today-is-world-philosophy-day-should-we-kill-healthy-people-for-their-organs/comment-page-1/#comment-279466</link>
		<dc:creator>Ally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporeality.net/museion/2008/11/20/today-is-world-philosophy-day-should-we-kill-healthy-people-for-their-organs/#comment-279466</guid>
		<description>I just asked my wife all these questions and she said that
she would always kill the few to save the many.

Should i be concerned,as what does it really mean?

If your using Logic then surely to sacrifice a few to save many
is the correct answer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just asked my wife all these questions and she said that<br />
she would always kill the few to save the many.</p>
<p>Should i be concerned,as what does it really mean?</p>
<p>If your using Logic then surely to sacrifice a few to save many<br />
is the correct answer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Virtual suicide &#8212; reclaim your real life by Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.corporeality.net/museion/2010/02/17/virtual-suicide-reclaim-your-real-life/comment-page-1/#comment-279145</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporeality.net/museion/?p=4005#comment-279145</guid>
		<description>What? This sounds unbelievable. Give some more details, please -- How did you try to write the names of the sites (as url&#039;s)? How did Facebook respond? Did you have the same problem with other url&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? This sounds unbelievable. Give some more details, please &#8212; How did you try to write the names of the sites (as url&#8217;s)? How did Facebook respond? Did you have the same problem with other url&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Virtual suicide &#8212; reclaim your real life by Jonas Paludan</title>
		<link>http://www.corporeality.net/museion/2010/02/17/virtual-suicide-reclaim-your-real-life/comment-page-1/#comment-279122</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Paludan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporeality.net/museion/?p=4005#comment-279122</guid>
		<description>Hi Thomas

Last night I discovered that it’s impossible to write the name of the two sites in a status update on Facebook. The site simply blocks you from mentioning either of them. Free speech? Not on Facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Thomas</p>
<p>Last night I discovered that it’s impossible to write the name of the two sites in a status update on Facebook. The site simply blocks you from mentioning either of them. Free speech? Not on Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1-2 Associate (Assistant) Professors in Medical Science Communication and/or Medical Science Heritage Production by 1-2 Associate (Assistant) Professors in Medical Science &#8230; &#124; Denmark today</title>
		<link>http://www.corporeality.net/museion/2010/03/09/1-2-associate-assistant-professors-in-medical-science-communication-andor-medical-science-heritage-production/comment-page-1/#comment-278787</link>
		<dc:creator>1-2 Associate (Assistant) Professors in Medical Science &#8230; &#124; Denmark today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporeality.net/museion/?p=4224#comment-278787</guid>
		<description>[...] See the rest here:  1-2 Associate (Assistant) Professors in Medical Science &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See the rest here:  1-2 Associate (Assistant) Professors in Medical Science &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Craig Venter’s A Life Decoded – a captivating read for adult boys (and for historians of the contemporary life sciences) by Dov Henis</title>
		<link>http://www.corporeality.net/museion/2008/07/03/craig-venter%e2%80%99s-a-life-decoded-%e2%80%93-a-captivating-read-for-adult-boys-and-for-historians-of-the-contemporary-life-sciences-2/comment-page-1/#comment-277447</link>
		<dc:creator>Dov Henis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 20:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporeality.net/museion/2008/07/03/craig-venter%e2%80%99s-a-life-decoded-%e2%80%93-a-captivating-read-for-adult-boys-and-for-historians-of-the-contemporary-life-sciences-2/#comment-277447</guid>
		<description>03.2010 Updated Life Manifest 

Update of 
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/140/122.page#2321

Recapitulation of some earlier notes on the 
Scientific Comprehension Of The Origin, Drive, Nature And Purpose Of Life 


A. Uniqueness Of science among human artifacts 

ALL aspects of our culture are, of course, anthropoartifacts, including science. Yet among those artifacts science has a distinct uniqueness for us. 

During the recent several centuries in the course of human history humans have been developing science at an accelerating rate as a provider of convincing, ever closer approaching, approximate models of the real world. 


B. Origin and nature of life

28Dec09 Implications Of E=Total[m(1 + D)] 
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/184.page#4587 

Astronomically there are two &quot;physics&quot;, a &quot;classical physics&quot; system of and between galactic clusters, and a &quot;quantum physics&quot; system WITHIN the galactic clusters.

The onset of big-bang&#039;s inflation started gravity, followed by formation of galactic clusters that behave as accelerating Newtonian bodies while continuously reconverting their shares of pre-inflation masses back to energy, that continuously fuels their ongoing expansion, and of endless intertwined evolutions WITHIN the clusters in attempts to resist-postpone this reconversion.

As mass is just another face of energy it is commonsensible to regard not only life, but mass in general, as a format of temporarily constrained energy.

It therefore ensues that whereas the in-space expanding cosmic constructs, the galaxies clusters, are - overall - continuously converting their original pre-inflation mass back to energy, the overall evolution WITHIN them, within the clusters, is in the opposite direction, temporarily constrained energy packages such as black holes and biospheres and other energy-storing mass-formats are precariuosly forming and &quot;doing best&quot; to survive &quot;as long as possible&quot;. 


C. The drive and nature of Earth life 

Earth life Genesis, formation of the first genes, was a phenomenon of serendipitous occurrence, in a supportive environment, of &#039;favourably-coursed&#039; energy potential between in-coming sun radiation and in-water polymerizing-precipitating RNA-related oligomeric configurations. 

The drive of Earth life and of its evolution is to enhance the functionality and survivability of Earth&#039;s genes, in order to maintain and enhance Earth-biosphere&#039;s temporary constrained energy storage, to maintain the biosphere BIO as long as possible. 

The RNA genes are life&#039;s prime strata organisms. They evolved their DNA-images as their organ, their continuously updated operational worklogs primal Earth&#039;s organisms libraries, and genomed them, i.e. nucleusized them, and celled them with their other organ, the outer cell membrane.

It is the RNA genes and their DNA replicas, life&#039;s prime strata organisms, that evolve, and the evolution of genomes, the 2nd stratum of life, and of the 3rd life stratum cellular organisms, is an interenhancing consequence of their genes&#039; evolution. 


D. The formation of Earth life 

Earth Life: 1. a format of temporarily constrained energy, retained in temporary constrained genetic energy packages in forms of genes, genomes and organisms 2. a real virtual affair that pops in and out of existence in its matrix, which is the energy constrained in Earth&#039;s biosphere. 

Earth organism: a temporary self-replicable constrained-energy genetic system that supports and maintains Earth&#039;s biosphere by proliferating and maintenance of genes. 

Gene: the primal Earth&#039;s organism and/or its functional DNA replicas. (1st stratum organism) 

Genome: a multigenes organism, comprising the genes operational replicas-work-patterns, an organ of the primal Earth&#039;s genes, consisting of a cooperative commune of its member genes. (2nd stratum organism) 

Cellular organisms: mono- or multi-celled Earth organisms. (3rd stratum organism) 


E. Update of underlying life sciences conception is thus feasible 

- First were independent individual RNA genes, Earth&#039;s primal organisms. 

- Genes aggregated cooperatively into genomes, RNA or their DNA replicas multigenes organisms, with genomes&#039; organs. 

- Simultaneously or consequently genomes evolved protective-functional membranes, their organs. 

- Then followed cellular organisms, with a variety of outer-cell membrane shapes and 
functionalities and a variety of inter- and intracell processes. 

This is a scientific, NOT A TECHNICAL, life-science conception. 

It is tomorrow&#039;s comprehension of life and of its evolution. 

IT IS FRAUGHT WITH INTRIGUING DARWINIAN EVOLUTION IMPLICATIONS. 

IT IS FRAUGHT WITH INTRIGUING TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS POTENTIALS. 


F. The purpose of OUR, human, life 

The purpose of OUR life and of its promotion is ours to formulate and set. It derives solely from our cognition. 


Suggesting, 

Dov Henis 
(Comments from 22nd century)

Cosmic Evolution Simplified
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/240/122.page#4427

http://profiles.yahoo.com/blog/2SF3CJJM5OU6T27OC4MFQSDYEU?num=5&amp;max=160&amp;start=0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>03.2010 Updated Life Manifest </p>
<p>Update of<br />
<a href="http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/140/122.page#2321" rel="nofollow">http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/140/122.page#2321</a></p>
<p>Recapitulation of some earlier notes on the<br />
Scientific Comprehension Of The Origin, Drive, Nature And Purpose Of Life </p>
<p>A. Uniqueness Of science among human artifacts </p>
<p>ALL aspects of our culture are, of course, anthropoartifacts, including science. Yet among those artifacts science has a distinct uniqueness for us. </p>
<p>During the recent several centuries in the course of human history humans have been developing science at an accelerating rate as a provider of convincing, ever closer approaching, approximate models of the real world. </p>
<p>B. Origin and nature of life</p>
<p>28Dec09 Implications Of E=Total[m(1 + D)]<br />
<a href="http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/184.page#4587" rel="nofollow">http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/184.page#4587</a> </p>
<p>Astronomically there are two &#8220;physics&#8221;, a &#8220;classical physics&#8221; system of and between galactic clusters, and a &#8220;quantum physics&#8221; system WITHIN the galactic clusters.</p>
<p>The onset of big-bang&#8217;s inflation started gravity, followed by formation of galactic clusters that behave as accelerating Newtonian bodies while continuously reconverting their shares of pre-inflation masses back to energy, that continuously fuels their ongoing expansion, and of endless intertwined evolutions WITHIN the clusters in attempts to resist-postpone this reconversion.</p>
<p>As mass is just another face of energy it is commonsensible to regard not only life, but mass in general, as a format of temporarily constrained energy.</p>
<p>It therefore ensues that whereas the in-space expanding cosmic constructs, the galaxies clusters, are &#8211; overall &#8211; continuously converting their original pre-inflation mass back to energy, the overall evolution WITHIN them, within the clusters, is in the opposite direction, temporarily constrained energy packages such as black holes and biospheres and other energy-storing mass-formats are precariuosly forming and &#8220;doing best&#8221; to survive &#8220;as long as possible&#8221;. </p>
<p>C. The drive and nature of Earth life </p>
<p>Earth life Genesis, formation of the first genes, was a phenomenon of serendipitous occurrence, in a supportive environment, of &#8216;favourably-coursed&#8217; energy potential between in-coming sun radiation and in-water polymerizing-precipitating RNA-related oligomeric configurations. </p>
<p>The drive of Earth life and of its evolution is to enhance the functionality and survivability of Earth&#8217;s genes, in order to maintain and enhance Earth-biosphere&#8217;s temporary constrained energy storage, to maintain the biosphere BIO as long as possible. </p>
<p>The RNA genes are life&#8217;s prime strata organisms. They evolved their DNA-images as their organ, their continuously updated operational worklogs primal Earth&#8217;s organisms libraries, and genomed them, i.e. nucleusized them, and celled them with their other organ, the outer cell membrane.</p>
<p>It is the RNA genes and their DNA replicas, life&#8217;s prime strata organisms, that evolve, and the evolution of genomes, the 2nd stratum of life, and of the 3rd life stratum cellular organisms, is an interenhancing consequence of their genes&#8217; evolution. </p>
<p>D. The formation of Earth life </p>
<p>Earth Life: 1. a format of temporarily constrained energy, retained in temporary constrained genetic energy packages in forms of genes, genomes and organisms 2. a real virtual affair that pops in and out of existence in its matrix, which is the energy constrained in Earth&#8217;s biosphere. </p>
<p>Earth organism: a temporary self-replicable constrained-energy genetic system that supports and maintains Earth&#8217;s biosphere by proliferating and maintenance of genes. </p>
<p>Gene: the primal Earth&#8217;s organism and/or its functional DNA replicas. (1st stratum organism) </p>
<p>Genome: a multigenes organism, comprising the genes operational replicas-work-patterns, an organ of the primal Earth&#8217;s genes, consisting of a cooperative commune of its member genes. (2nd stratum organism) </p>
<p>Cellular organisms: mono- or multi-celled Earth organisms. (3rd stratum organism) </p>
<p>E. Update of underlying life sciences conception is thus feasible </p>
<p>- First were independent individual RNA genes, Earth&#8217;s primal organisms. </p>
<p>- Genes aggregated cooperatively into genomes, RNA or their DNA replicas multigenes organisms, with genomes&#8217; organs. </p>
<p>- Simultaneously or consequently genomes evolved protective-functional membranes, their organs. </p>
<p>- Then followed cellular organisms, with a variety of outer-cell membrane shapes and<br />
functionalities and a variety of inter- and intracell processes. </p>
<p>This is a scientific, NOT A TECHNICAL, life-science conception. </p>
<p>It is tomorrow&#8217;s comprehension of life and of its evolution. </p>
<p>IT IS FRAUGHT WITH INTRIGUING DARWINIAN EVOLUTION IMPLICATIONS. </p>
<p>IT IS FRAUGHT WITH INTRIGUING TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS POTENTIALS. </p>
<p>F. The purpose of OUR, human, life </p>
<p>The purpose of OUR life and of its promotion is ours to formulate and set. It derives solely from our cognition. </p>
<p>Suggesting, </p>
<p>Dov Henis<br />
(Comments from 22nd century)</p>
<p>Cosmic Evolution Simplified<br />
<a href="http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/240/122.page#4427" rel="nofollow">http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/240/122.page#4427</a></p>
<p><a href="http://profiles.yahoo.com/blog/2SF3CJJM5OU6T27OC4MFQSDYEU?num=5&amp;max=160&amp;start=0" rel="nofollow">http://profiles.yahoo.com/blog/2SF3CJJM5OU6T27OC4MFQSDYEU?num=5&amp;max=160&amp;start=0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alter-realism &#8212; dispense with the sci- and bioart gallery and make scientific reality our experimentation lab by Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.corporeality.net/museion/2010/03/05/the-alterrealist-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-277425</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporeality.net/museion/?p=4161#comment-277425</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m in total agreement here, Thomas, but there also seems to a another angle on this issue. In your rewriting of the quote from Haddow, you suggest (rightly) that we should take our experimentation into &#039;scientific reality&#039; (i.e. the lab). But from another perspective &#039;scientific reality&#039; is not just the lab, but all of reality itself. &#039;Scientific reality&#039; might be akin to a term like &#039;like itself&#039; - science, in this case biomedicine, gets more and more capable of changing reality as such. Thus one could change your last lines to read:
&quot;Go to reality instead, do some real experiments and re-frame this practice into an aesthetic experiment unfolding in &#039;life itself&#039;. Reality is your art gallery.&quot;

This message was brought to you by the Committee for Random Associations from Materialist Philosophy (CRAMP).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in total agreement here, Thomas, but there also seems to a another angle on this issue. In your rewriting of the quote from Haddow, you suggest (rightly) that we should take our experimentation into &#8217;scientific reality&#8217; (i.e. the lab). But from another perspective &#8217;scientific reality&#8217; is not just the lab, but all of reality itself. &#8216;Scientific reality&#8217; might be akin to a term like &#8216;like itself&#8217; &#8211; science, in this case biomedicine, gets more and more capable of changing reality as such. Thus one could change your last lines to read:<br />
&#8220;Go to reality instead, do some real experiments and re-frame this practice into an aesthetic experiment unfolding in &#8216;life itself&#8217;. Reality is your art gallery.&#8221;</p>
<p>This message was brought to you by the Committee for Random Associations from Materialist Philosophy (CRAMP).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Alter-realism &#8212; dispense with the sci- and bioart gallery and make scientific reality our experimentation lab by Lucy</title>
		<link>http://www.corporeality.net/museion/2010/03/05/the-alterrealist-museum/comment-page-1/#comment-277363</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 09:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporeality.net/museion/?p=4161#comment-277363</guid>
		<description>I couldn’t agree more. Often artists TAKE from the lab rather than SHARE or GIVE. Elements taken are frequently superficial aethetics and artworks produced by artists inspired by outcomes of biological imaging etc. may shift meaning, change value and become interesting images that relate little to the original artefact or concept. Over the last ten years my work has been created in the lab or dissection room rather than in the traditional setting of the artists&#039; studio. I have used drawing as a way of bringing the lab into the gallery and as a system for communicating the role of drawing as a participatory way to reveal insights into objects. Continuing this within the context of the collections in the Museion adds another equally important space to the list. The public are not usually privy to the lab and the dissection rooms but can see medical sciences within the museum. This space welcomes visitors and gives them the opportunity to see medical artefacts and learn about medical concepts within an historical setting. Drawing allows visitors time to look at objects and find deeper understanding of them. It also benefits the artefacts as their importance as objects is highlighted and they are appreciated more fully. Rather than the final artwork being the main focus, it is the origin, the object originally observed and the insights revealed that become the most important aspect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn’t agree more. Often artists TAKE from the lab rather than SHARE or GIVE. Elements taken are frequently superficial aethetics and artworks produced by artists inspired by outcomes of biological imaging etc. may shift meaning, change value and become interesting images that relate little to the original artefact or concept. Over the last ten years my work has been created in the lab or dissection room rather than in the traditional setting of the artists&#8217; studio. I have used drawing as a way of bringing the lab into the gallery and as a system for communicating the role of drawing as a participatory way to reveal insights into objects. Continuing this within the context of the collections in the Museion adds another equally important space to the list. The public are not usually privy to the lab and the dissection rooms but can see medical sciences within the museum. This space welcomes visitors and gives them the opportunity to see medical artefacts and learn about medical concepts within an historical setting. Drawing allows visitors time to look at objects and find deeper understanding of them. It also benefits the artefacts as their importance as objects is highlighted and they are appreciated more fully. Rather than the final artwork being the main focus, it is the origin, the object originally observed and the insights revealed that become the most important aspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Medicine 2.0 in a historical perspective by Health 2.0 in News: Self-Guided Research and Dangers of Google Buzz &#171; ScienceRoll</title>
		<link>http://www.corporeality.net/museion/2010/02/24/medicine-2-0-in-a-historical-perspective/comment-page-1/#comment-276342</link>
		<dc:creator>Health 2.0 in News: Self-Guided Research and Dangers of Google Buzz &#171; ScienceRoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporeality.net/museion/?p=4061#comment-276342</guid>
		<description>[...] Medicine 2.0 in a historical perspective (Biomedicine on Display) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Medicine 2.0 in a historical perspective (Biomedicine on Display) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on In-your-face marketing by Dewight</title>
		<link>http://www.corporeality.net/museion/2010/02/23/in-your-face-outreach/comment-page-1/#comment-275174</link>
		<dc:creator>Dewight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporeality.net/museion/?p=3842#comment-275174</guid>
		<description>I agree, marketing is quite difficult task, I can attest as I am a marketer myself. you need to be creative, unique and outstanding. &quot;In-your-face marketing&quot; nice tactics! good for you, you found a marketing style just perfect for your niche=)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, marketing is quite difficult task, I can attest as I am a marketer myself. you need to be creative, unique and outstanding. &#8220;In-your-face marketing&#8221; nice tactics! good for you, you found a marketing style just perfect for your niche=)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A digital preservation primer for scientists by Dealing with a big problem &#171; A Man With A Ph.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.corporeality.net/museion/2010/02/01/a-digital-preservation-primer-for-scientists/comment-page-1/#comment-275158</link>
		<dc:creator>Dealing with a big problem &#171; A Man With A Ph.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporeality.net/museion/?p=3666#comment-275158</guid>
		<description>[...] weeks’s blog post is a guest post on the Biomedicine on Display blog – I was kindly invited by Thomas Soderqvist [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] weeks’s blog post is a guest post on the Biomedicine on Display blog – I was kindly invited by Thomas Soderqvist [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
